Disjunction elimination

Rule of inference of propositional logic
Disjunction elimination
TypeRule of inference
FieldPropositional calculus
StatementIf a statement P {\displaystyle P} implies a statement Q {\displaystyle Q} and a statement R {\displaystyle R} also implies Q {\displaystyle Q} , then if either P {\displaystyle P} or R {\displaystyle R} is true, then Q {\displaystyle Q} has to be true.
Symbolic statement P Q , R Q , P R Q {\displaystyle {\frac {P\to Q,R\to Q,P\lor R}{\therefore Q}}}
Transformation rules
Propositional calculus
Rules of inference
  • Implication introduction / elimination (modus ponens)
  • Biconditional introduction / elimination
  • Conjunction introduction / elimination
  • Disjunction introduction / elimination
  • Disjunctive / hypothetical syllogism
  • Constructive / destructive dilemma
  • Absorption / modus tollens / modus ponendo tollens
  • Negation introduction
Rules of replacement
  • Associativity
  • Commutativity
  • Distributivity
  • Double negation
  • De Morgan's laws
  • Transposition
  • Material implication
  • Exportation
  • Tautology
Predicate logic
Rules of inference
  • Universal generalization / instantiation
  • Existential generalization / instantiation

In propositional logic, disjunction elimination[1][2] (sometimes named proof by cases, case analysis, or or elimination) is the valid argument form and rule of inference that allows one to eliminate a disjunctive statement from a logical proof. It is the inference that if a statement P {\displaystyle P} implies a statement Q {\displaystyle Q} and a statement R {\displaystyle R} also implies Q {\displaystyle Q} , then if either P {\displaystyle P} or R {\displaystyle R} is true, then Q {\displaystyle Q} has to be true. The reasoning is simple: since at least one of the statements P and R is true, and since either of them would be sufficient to entail Q, Q is certainly true.

An example in English:

If I'm inside, I have my wallet on me.
If I'm outside, I have my wallet on me.
It is true that either I'm inside or I'm outside.
Therefore, I have my wallet on me.

It is the rule can be stated as:

P Q , R Q , P R Q {\displaystyle {\frac {P\to Q,R\to Q,P\lor R}{\therefore Q}}}

where the rule is that whenever instances of " P Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} ", and " R Q {\displaystyle R\to Q} " and " P R {\displaystyle P\lor R} " appear on lines of a proof, " Q {\displaystyle Q} " can be placed on a subsequent line.

Formal notation

The disjunction elimination rule may be written in sequent notation:

( P Q ) , ( R Q ) , ( P R ) Q {\displaystyle (P\to Q),(R\to Q),(P\lor R)\vdash Q}

where {\displaystyle \vdash } is a metalogical symbol meaning that Q {\displaystyle Q} is a syntactic consequence of P Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} , and R Q {\displaystyle R\to Q} and P R {\displaystyle P\lor R} in some logical system;

and expressed as a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

( ( ( P Q ) ( R Q ) ) ( P R ) ) Q {\displaystyle (((P\to Q)\land (R\to Q))\land (P\lor R))\to Q}

where P {\displaystyle P} , Q {\displaystyle Q} , and R {\displaystyle R} are propositions expressed in some formal system.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Rule of Or-Elimination - ProofWiki". Archived from the original on 2015-04-18. Retrieved 2015-04-09.
  2. ^ "Proof by cases". Archived from the original on 2002-03-07.